|
|
The
Cast Valve
seems rather oddly named - I work with several different types of valves in
ventilators and obviously have valves for my car tyres and none of them look
like the shape of this puzzle but, to be honest, I cannot think of anything
better to name this one. It was designed by Vesa Timonen who has been
extremely prolific over the years and has had nine other Hanayama puzzles
produced as well as several others over the years. His designs are always fun
and usually just the right level of difficulty to challenge you without
putting you off. Hanayama has rated it as level 4 out of 6 and PuzzleMaster as
level 8 (in their silly 5 - 10 scale).
The puzzle here is a rather attractive hexagonal shape with a frame into which
there are three further pieces inserted. It is 4.5 x 4.2 x 1.6cm in size and
made from a yellow brass-like metal frame and matching colour centre piece and
two shiny silver semicircular pieces that fit between them. The aim is to
dismantle the puzzle and then put it back together by navigating the interior
moving maze formed by the pieces. Now, the master of this sort of puzzle is
the
genius
himself,
Derek Bosch, the designer of the original (and many subsequent) helical burrs which I
have gone completely bananas over on this blog. Having solved this puzzle by
Vesa, it reminds me of the very first of Derek's designs, the
Tubular burr which is effectively a stick burr in a frame but with circular pieces
that can rotate around and through each other. The Cast Valve is just like
this.
My early fiddling showed a fairly constrained bit of movement as the pieces
lock and unlock each other. I realised early on that I would probably need to
take notes to keep track of the moves that I try so that I don't go around in
circles (literally as well as figuratively) - I sort of needed to make up my
own notation for it. Within about 10 minutes, I had made great progress and
the pieces were rotating and rising and falling within the frame nicely. Great
I thunk, I'll have this done in no time and have one in the bag for the blog.
Except, I felt I had made reasonable progress and could not advance any
further. I must have missed an exit of the maze pathway somewhere so time to
backtrack and trace it out with pressure on different bits to try and find the
hidden path. It's a fiddly bugger when you try and do that - just a bit too
small to allow you to do this with ease. After an evening of playing and
swearing (I seem to do that a lot!) I realised what was going on - yes, it is
just like any other burr in that it has blind pathways that lead you the wrong
way. Yes, of course, my first exploration had taken me completely in the wrong
direction.
Having realised my error I made pretty good progress again until I reached a
point where I was almost able to remove a piece but not quite. Here again I
got stuck for a while. The tolerances on these are very very tight. Things
need to be lined up just right to let you progress at certain points. After a
couple of days I had managed this:
Not a spoiler - you cannot possibly see enough to work it out. |
This is a nice little puzzle which I enjoyed a lot. What it did reinforce to
me was that Derek's helical type burrs would be fabulous made as a cast
puzzle (the original would be a perfect difficulty level) - I am sure that
Steve and Ali have looked into making one out of brass but they would be
hellishly tough to mill - it would be perfect to cast. Please Hanayama, have
a little chat with our friendly genius!
How can you say a puzzle that took several days is a mere 4?!!
ReplyDeleteThey puzzle pushes the limits of 8 easy, the size being as small as it is makes it hard to manipulate with adult size hands…my first attempt it dropped into a position I was unable to get out of , even with force, again the size was a hindrance. I returned it for another thinking (hoping) it was a defect…I purchased one for a puzzle loving friend and he also locked up his…
My second attempt, I made very small movements to ensure not getting locked in the point of no return.
To avoid using a hammer & saw I took a few days to solve it. It is not a 4 in anyone’s scale!
I think that 4 is perfectly reasonable when I compare to some of the 5 and 6 rated puzzles which I have taken months to solve or even completely failed. I don’t understand how you locked it up. The puzzle moves very nicely and is a nice smooth sequence. It just takes a while to work out what is required. I stand by my and Hanayama’s rating.
Delete